HEADER ADS 728X90

Patent troll wins Bitcoin logo trademark, sparks Amazon and Etsy takedowns despite Spain court rulings

A controversial trademark registration in Spain for the Bitcoin logo has ignited widespread backlash after online sellers reported mass takedowns of Bitcoin-branded merchandise from major e-commerce platforms like Amazon and Etsy.

Patent troll wins Bitcoin logo trademark, sparks Amazon and Etsy takedowns despite Spain court rulings

Despite multiple Spanish court rulings affirming that Bitcoin’s symbol belongs to the public domain, a newly registered mark—recorded under ES5020240 M4296236—has triggered aggressive enforcement actions across global marketplaces. Sellers received infringement notices tied to the Spain-based registration, leading to rapid removals of products ranging from apparel to accessories.


advertise

The incident underscores a significant disconnect between marketplace enforcement systems and legal realities. Amazon’s Brand Registry and Etsy’s IP reporting tools allow claimants with verified government-issued registrations to request takedowns with minimal friction. Since Spain’s intellectual property office (OEPM) and the EU Intellectual Property Office are on the approved list, platforms act swiftly on such claims—even when the underlying mark’s validity is under legal question.

However, Spain’s judicial precedent tells a different story. Both the Bilbao Commercial Court and the Audiencia Provincial de Vizcaya have ruled that the Bitcoin logo and wordmark are part of the public domain, invalidating previous monopoly attempts and citing community ownership. These rulings emphasize that private parties cannot claim exclusive rights over a decentralized symbol.


advertise

In the short term, merchants should expect intermittent takedowns as marketplaces process pending notices. Over the medium term, invalidity actions and appeals citing Spain’s public domain rulings could challenge or overturn the disputed registration. Until then, procedural caution—documenting takedowns, filing counter-notices, and referencing prior judgments—remains vital for sellers. The broader issue now hinges on whether global e-commerce platforms will refine their enforcement protocols to account for legal contradictions in single-country filings that impact worldwide commerce.

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Telegram
Twitter/X
Facebook
Instagram
Join Telegram